Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
From: "WB" <cab75 () comcast net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:14:22 -0500
Prove they didn't count. Factually and in a manor that would stand up in a court of law. Anyone who buys into this line without knowing / having the facts is just fueling speculation. If Kerry had thought he'd won, he'd be in court. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud., (continued)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Exibar (Nov 11)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Jan Krüger (Nov 11)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. pandora (Nov 11)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. dk (Nov 11)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Paul Schmehl (Nov 12)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Bart . Lansing (Nov 15)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- Re: OTRe: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Randall Perry (Nov 11)
- RE: OTRe: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Dennis Heaton (Nov 11)
- Re: OTRe: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Micah McNelly (Nov 11)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Exibar (Nov 11)
- Re: Re: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Vincent Archer (Nov 12)