Re: 8->OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

[Jason <security () brvenik com>]

I brought this up before the elections and very few seemed interested in 
the topic. There were the normal grumblings of get this off list...

If you want to know more about electronic voting see 
http://www.verifiedvoting.org and http://http://www.blackboxvoting.org/


Clairmont, Jan M wrote:

> I think we should keep this discussion going as long as 
> we are able, just to frustrate the thought police Nazi's
> on this group. It is really ironic that a legitimate discussion
> of electronic voting and Diebold and other voting systems, that
> are not secure, is considered off-limits by some so-called
> authorities.
>
> So please continue the discussion and I am interested as well
> as many others who would like to know more about irregularities
> and vulnerabilities of voting machines.  Some use windows as their
> servers and windows OS's so they are liable to hacking like any 
> on-line system.  Does anyone know anything about the OS versions
> Diebold was using and what testing was done to ensure the integrity
> of the count?
>
> Warm Regards to the Thought Police?->
> Jan Clairmont
> Firewall Administrator/Consultant
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>  

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html