Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004
From: Danny <nocmonkey () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:15:59 -0400
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:27:42 -0400, d31337 <d31337 () gmail com> wrote:
I should have been more specific to eliminate confusion for those who consider IE part of the OS. Revised comment: Interesting that XP SP2 doesn't seem to be impacted by any of the *Windows* (not IE) vulnerabilities...
I see your point, however, I would say IE is more a part of Windows than any other component. Now, back to your theme, yes, I also agree that Windows XP SP2 was less affected by these vulns than any other version of Windows. I would like to tell Microsoft, this is the way it *should* be! ...D _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 d31337 (Oct 12)
- Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 Danny (Oct 12)
- Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 James Riden (Oct 12)
- Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 d31337 (Oct 12)
- Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 Eric Paynter (Oct 12)
- Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 Danny (Oct 12)
- Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 James Riden (Oct 12)
- Re: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 Danny (Oct 12)
- SV: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004 Peter Kruse (Oct 12)