Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
From: "Vince Able" <we_hate_vince () hotmail com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:24:27 -0400
Well what a nice first post to read entering Full-Disclosure. LoL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry Fitzgerald" <bkfsec () sdf lonestar org> To: "ASB" <abaker () gmail com> Cc: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 8:41 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
ASB wrote:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Next time, please read the thread in context. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The context of the thread is that an application issue is being incorrectly interpreted as an OS issue.Oversimplification is for the foolish. Like I said, you're not too
bright.
You're showing very little understanding of system architecture here. My point regarding where the code was located had to do with a generalized statement regarding applications being at fault for issues and for them not being OS issues. My point was that it's not always clear cut. I was not trying to say that this case was an OS issue. I was trying to say that the line is not always black and white. I was also pointing out that none of us know because the only information we have to go on is third-hand and imprecise. If you can predict conditions based on imprecise third-hand information, then what are you doing here?!? Go solve the world's problems or something. of course, you can't so you've decided to just flame people. Please re-read my posts and think before you respond. If, besides misreading my posts, you can find no argument with what I've said (which, you won't, because I'm right) then I'm willing to hear them. Other than that, you're just wasting everyone's time by trying to railroad points that you don't understand. -Barry _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11, (continued)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Michal Zalewski (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Michal Zalewski (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 devis (Sep 25)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Barry Fitzgerald (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 ASB (Sep 26)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Exibar (Sep 26)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Ron DuFresne (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Barry Fitzgerald (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Vince Able (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 ASB (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Mike Nice (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Geo. (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Georgi Guninski (Sep 24)