Re: N3td3v poll

["Native.Code" <native.code () gmail com>]

Another n3td3v quote: "I really think if I or *my people* were...."

On 12/21/05, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:
> I really think if I or my people were to take the opportunity to study
> the code, there would a lot than 36 votes sitting on that file. No one
> has the spare resources to even care about hacking such a meaningless,
> child-like poll. Time to get back to what counts, and thats research
> into Google and Yahoo. I think if there was a case of vote rigging,
> however, it would be carried out by my opponents, who are more than
> willing to carry this anti-n3td3v propaganda way into 2006, to ruin my
> reputation, and to pollute the list with polls and quotes, seen
> already in this and past anti-n3td3v threads. Have a good new year,
> i'm sure you'll have no vulnerabilities to disclose, since you're
> someone who just hates on people who do disclose vulnerabilities to
> vendors and the security community.
>
> On 12/21/05, fok yo <yoo.fok () gmail com> wrote:
> > The skies are falling:
> > Famous security woe N3td3v found yet another critical internet
> > vulnerability, this time in snappoll...
> > He managed voting 36 times (once for each alter-ego ?).
> > Is snappoll as flawed as diebold?
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/