Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Spy Agency Mined Vast Data Trove


From: Steve Kudlak <chromazine () sbcglobal net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:30:53 -0800


Uh let's see I don't know if this is thje place to discuss this. There has been enouigh evidence of governmental misbehavior in the past with various programs that I wouldn't trust the powers that be to always be benevolent to go away if nothing bad is happening. There is Steve Kurtz the artists who got into trouble for growing a microrganism commonly gown in high school classes. If one reads the actual transcripts of Federal Prosecutions one finds that often they do go through someone's life and if they don't find the real big thing they wanted, they will try to find some very small thing, something akin to ignoring something on a click license or a shrink license. They threaten the defendents a lot and often they will get some silly conviction which to them is minor to the person who is convicted and has a messed up life is a lot. A lot of the motivating factors here, one is that such prosecutions are expensive and there is the desire not to go away empty handed. Now as of late they have gotten into so much troubl;e with this they have been losing outright in US Federal Court which usually doesn't happen. In most cases it has involved the increased descretion given to various authorities by the current atmosphere of security is so important that if the Bill of Rights is bent or ignored a bit then it's OK.

I am not saying any of this(data mining and sorting thru lots of stuff trying to find scary keywords) should never ever happen but just it is sort of naive to assume that if one has nothing to hide and has done nothing wrong that one has nothing to fear. It is easy to go through someone's life and find things that while not illegal are embarassing and use this to threaten them for a variety of purposes. The story of J Edgar Hoover trying to find something to embarass or threaten Martin Luther King is well known. Others are known also and then is somewhat of a history of abuse of power so I hold the "nothing to hide/nothing to fear" concept to be naive. Another point is that if has ever had friends who say grew certain vegetables or did other such questionable things one obviously knows they don't refer to any of the things they are doing by "cleartext names" but use innocent sounding words and phrases, Now one curious thing I heard from a friend who is an Arabic translator is that some people hope that occassional in Arabic or some other native language people will mention something out in the open.

I did have a technical thought or question. Datamining can be used for less nefarious purposes and I wonder if anyone knows any good source texts if one were teaching a course in the area. Those I read are woefully inadequate and I was wonde4ring if this is because those that have useful techniques aren't into much disclosure much less full disclosure. So if anyone know of any tests or sources for connections databases it would be nice to here of them. I was thinking of applications in art, science and medicine, like looking through OTC purchases to see if there has been a serious uptick in consumption of products that indicate a possible diesese outbreak. I know there was a plan to track anti-diarrhea medications because many seriousl diseases manifest themselves with that symptom and the condition in itself can be dangerous.


Have Fun,
Sends Steve


P.S. It was funny that the head of the TIA project at DARPA at one point was someone from the Nixon Admin not necessarily concerned with people's privacy or their rights. I suspect it is the overstepping of boundaries by that adninistration that provides the most compelling evidence that maybe we want to be careful giving people too much power to look at our various dealings,


Leif Ericksen wrote:

Actually after reading some of the the comments I have to say you all
missed the point...  *IF* you are not doing *nothing illegal* and have
nothing to hide no big deal.

"I do not want the Government to see my banking info"
HUM, did you ever hear of the SSN?  Are you putting massive amounts of
cash that can not be accounted for into your bank?  BUT wait what is the
limit it used to be $10,000US that if you moved that much money you had
to fill out some papers as to why you were moving that money.  So the
government will know.

Bottom line there will me so much 'noise' if the listen to everything
they will loose track of legitimate deviant traffic.  The only monitor
so much of it and then turn off the listening until the system wakes up.

Again, if all you actions are legit they will soon go away and leave you
alone.  The old joke on the net like 10 years ago was to add lines like
Death Bomb Kill Destroy, White House, nuclear, waste, President, Give
names of current or recent past presidents, Bush, Clinton, Regan, Nixon
Ford, etc.   Those supposedly activated the echelon system.

Also thinking back to a security to a class I had in computer security
(now I may date myself just a little) Back in 1988 The instructor
mentioned how the NSA monitors ALL traffic from the US to an overseas
source, even more so banking traffic.  Well one time a Bank had some
agents visit them demanding the key to the encryption they used to send
something over seas.  Well the laugh was on the NSA.  According to this
instructor, that company said to the NSA all we did us used crypt on the
VAX.  The NSA agent(s) said thank you and left.

Now maybe I am being monitored at this time and will be for some time
because of this message.  NO big deal to me.  I intend no harm, at least
until the government tries to control what I do when I do it and how I
do it. (I see a day like that coming, I feel it will be of dare I say
the word on this list???  Biblical proportions)  It is inevitable, in
general humans are stupid.  Go to the Darwin Awards web page and see for
yourself.  At times the Darwin principle of the stupid and the weak
creatures die off and only the strong genes survive does not always
apply to the human race.  We keep doing stupid things, and one day we
are going to have a massive fight in the world and blow the whole dang
thing up.  Then again maybe the alien's that ALL governments seem to
cover up the existence of will soon get ticked off at us and come and
destroy our planet (Star Trek anyone?) go so that the human parasite
will not come out and destroy their worlds. (MY planet! my land, no my
land, mine, no mine, no mine)

I will admit this...  I live in a state where we have an electronic
device in our car that is used on the tollway that pays your fees for
being on the road.  Well, that devices has time stamps for when you
passed through the booth, and is registered to your car(S) well, if it
is 3 miles from one booth to the next that would be 3 minutes at 60MPH
So if you make it from one booth to the next in less that 3 minutes you
are speeding, but then again you are already because your are supposed
to go 15MPH through most booths and about 1 mile from the booth you are
supposed to slow down to 40MPH and I think at .5 miles from the booth
you are supposed to slow down to 30MPH.  I will admit that I often find
myself going in excess of 60MPH on the highway. sometimes even over 80
and that is because I am afraid I am going to get hit by the moron(s)
doing 90+ For the autobahn drivers or other places where such speeds may
be the norm.  Our roadways are not really designed for that even more so
in the winter with snow and ice.


--
Leif

On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 12:11 -0800, Kurt Buff wrote:
Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 10:11:45PM -0600, Leif Ericksen wrote:

Really if we have nothing to hide we should not fear them listening to
us.  Now if they come in and start forcing a special mark or code word
or something special in order to live or buy or sell anything then it is
time to revolt.
Now, that is an interesting view of someone who really is not paying
attention.

What would you qualify as "something to hide" ? How about my banking
account data ? How about the trade secrets of my company ?
Interesting line of argument, but really beside the point. You are
correct that Leif has taken the wrong line of argument, but you yourself
haven't quite got it right.

Leif speaks as if the government has a right to monitor our thoughts.
Such a stance indicates that we are property of (a|the) government.

Just the opposite is true. The just government serves at the pleasure of
its citizens, and must not be allowed any more power than what is
strictly necessary, if any at all.

For the US, the 4th Amendment applies, and all of the history
surrounding it - secure in papers and effects, unreasonable
search/seizure, etc.

The recent NSA actions (and older programs, too, such as Echelon), taken
at the behest of Presidential directive, are clearly illegal, and
destructive of the relationship between citizens and their government.

The 1st Amendment also applies, in that free speech can also be private,
with unauthorized others excluded, for whatever reason, and/or
anonymous. If government intrudes, it has an unwarranted chilling effect.

Kurt
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: