Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd)
From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl () mfn org>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:23:24 -0600 (CST)
Sing that song of apologia!!! On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Jamie C. Pole wrote:
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:07:23 -0600 From: Jamie C. Pole <jpole () jcpa com> To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) Our Federal government cannot enter a disaster area unless invited by the governor of the state. In the case of Katrina, the governor was more concerned with getting re-elected than she was with saving her constituents. Her recently-disclosed email messages prove this. Also, the mayor ordered a mandatory evacuation (when it was too late to enforce), but most people didn't leave. If you place yourself in harms way, is it the government's responsibility to extricate you? The head of FEMA was a bonehead, but that problem has been fixed. Are you now going to tell me that the US Army Corps of Engineers went into New Orleans to blow holes in the levees? Or maybe we caused hurricane Katrina with our special nuclear-powered hurricane-generators? Just checking... Jamie On Dec 18, 2005, at 10:56 PM, GroundZero Security wrote:lol you mean the RAF stuff ? that was ages ago and we learned from that. or in the 70s at olympia. sure that was bad since we didnt even have special forces as we werent used to terrorists or war anymore we usually dont bother about such things. usa is mainly focused on war industry thoughok sorry i didnt finish this. i didn't have much sleep last night so execuse me please. what i missed is that we didnt have special forces but we have some now. and i'm very confident they would do a good job. also if we have a disaster we dont have to wait 6 days for help to arrive i trust my gov on that. i feel pretty save also "if" a terrorist attack would happen we surely would not invade a country. unless that countries gov is attacking us._______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin () mfn org 0xBD4A95BF Just once, can't we have a nice polite discussion about the logistics and planning side of large criminal enterprise? - Steve Thompson _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) GroundZero Security (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) Jamie C. Pole (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) J.A. Terranson (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) Jamie C. Pole (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) Rodrigo Barbosa (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) Jamie C. Pole (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) bkfsec (Dec 19)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) J.A. Terranson (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial about recentevents.(fwd) Jamie C. Pole (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial aboutrecentevents.(fwd) GroundZero Security (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial aboutrecentevents.(fwd) Dude VanWinkle (Dec 18)
- Was: A small editorial aboutrecentevents. Jamie C. Pole (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorial aboutrecentevents.(fwd) Jamie C. Pole (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorialaboutrecentevents.(fwd) GroundZero Security (Dec 18)
- Re: [Clips] A small editorialaboutrecentevents.(fwd) Jamie C. Pole (Dec 18)