Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance
From: R S <rs2321 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:54:25 +0530
On 12/2/05, Aditya Deshmukh <aditya.deshmukh () online gateway strangled net> wrote:
Why cant you use google to find out this ?The same reason you can't use Google and find your answer fuckbag.
Are you n3td3v ? In the spirit of full-disclosure I support anyone's [doesn't matter if it is a troll like infosecbofh or netdev] right to express their opinion, but turning abusive should be a reason enough to be kicked off any public mailing list. I have already filtered out these people, but I still get to read some of the abusive emails because some others feel that these people deserve a reply. Can the moderator please issue a warning to these abusive trolls? Also is it too much to ask the "great security minds" in this list to contain their need to reply to these trolls?
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Madison, Marc (Dec 01)
- RE: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Aditya Deshmukh (Dec 01)
- SOX whistleblower requirements challenged in court? (Was SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance) Jesse W. Asher (Dec 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance wilder_jeff Wilder (Dec 01)
- RE: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Madison, Marc (Dec 01)
- RE: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Aditya Deshmukh (Dec 01)
- Re: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance InfoSecBOFH (Dec 02)
- Re: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance R S (Dec 02)
- RE: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Aditya Deshmukh (Dec 01)