Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: ICMP Covert channels question
From: <lists-security () nettracers com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:18:15 -0800
"As an attacker, I would not design an exploit that *depended* upon private addresses being routed external to the victim's router unless I first verified that they were. Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)" But Paul, you know that crackers rely on the misconfigured, unpatched masses to exploit, not the people with properly configured routers and systems. While you and I will implement ingress and egress anti-spoofing rules, in the field I see plenty of misconfigured routers that don't. - Bryan K. Watson - bwatson () nettracers com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- ICMP Covert channels question cyberpixl (Jan 28)
- Re: ICMP Covert channels question Andrew Farmer (Jan 28)
- Re: ICMP Covert channels question Paul Schmehl (Jan 28)
- RE: ICMP Covert channels question lists-security (Jan 29)
- RE: ICMP Covert channels question Paul Schmehl (Jan 29)
- RE: ICMP Covert channels question lists-security (Jan 29)
- RE: ICMP Covert channels question lists-security (Jan 29)
- Re: ICMP Covert channels question cyberpixl (Jan 30)
- Re: ICMP Covert channels question Gadi Evron (Jan 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICMP Covert channels question Darren Bounds (Jan 29)