Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:17:34 +0300
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:35:52PM -0400, Steven M. Christey wrote:
In addition, vulnerability databases and notification services have to:
(7) be responsible and ethical, without being whores [1]. (8) help make the infidels responsible and ethical. [1] http://www.whitehats.ca/main/about_us/policies/draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt Steve Christey INTERNET-DRAFT MITRE Valid for six months Chris Wysopal Category: Best Current Practice @stake, Inc. February 2002 Responsible Vulnerability Disclosure Process draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt -- where do you want bill gates to go today? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything Steven M. Christey (Jul 15)
- Re: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything Georgi Guninski (Jul 16)
- Re: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything ph0enix (Jul 16)
- Re: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything Georgi Guninski (Jul 16)
- RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything aaron_kempf (Jul 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything Jason Coombs (Jul 16)
- Re: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything J.A. Terranson (Jul 16)
- Re: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything Georgi Guninski (Jul 16)