Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything
From: "Eric Paynter" <eric () arcticbears com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, July 18, 2005 8:55 am, aaron_kempf () hotmail com said:
I just don't mean for VULNS. I mean for BUGS. Like when you import stuff from Access.. You try to import a spreadsheet AND IT DOESN'T FRIGGIN WORK.
Of course, you have the option to use another product. MS may be the most dominant player, but they aren't the only player. They would improve quickly if people (including large corporations) started forcing them to improve by choosing alternatives. Unfortunately, most people don't care about the little bugs. I think this is getting a little OT since it's no longer about security problems. -Eric -- arctic bears - email and dns services http://www.arcticbears.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything security curmudgeon (Jul 16)
- RE: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything aaron_kempf (Jul 18)
- RE: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything Eric Paynter (Jul 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything Steven M. Christey (Jul 17)
- RE: RE: Why Vulnerability Databases can't do everything aaron_kempf (Jul 18)