Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Reverse dns
From: Vincent Archer <var () deny-all com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:30:54 +0100
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:57:57AM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Is there an RFC *requirement* for reverse dns?
The only one I can think of is RFC 1033... 1987 is not exactly current, but so far, it's not been superseded or obsoleted. (the section is in "INSTRUCTIONS", "Adding a host" & "Adding Gateways") -- Vincent ARCHER varcher () denyall com Tel : +33 (0)1 40 07 47 14 Fax : +33 (0)1 40 07 47 27 Deny All - 5, rue Scribe - 75009 Paris - France www.denyall.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Vincent Archer (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Duo (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Duo (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Danny (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) TheGesus (Mar 10)
- RE: Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Edward Ray (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Dave Korn (Mar 11)
- Re: Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Danny (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Vincent Archer (Mar 10)