Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Reverse dns

From: Ben McGinnes <ben () adversary org>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:30:40 +1100

Paul Schmehl(pauls () utdallas edu)@Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:57:57AM -0600:

Is there an RFC *requirement* for reverse dns?


This doesn't overtly state a requirement for reverse DNS, but the
existence of BCP 20 (aka RFC 2317) indicates the assumption of reverse
DNS as being standard.  This document describes how to configure
classless reverse DNS records.  You could consider it as
circumstantial evidence in favour.


Regards,
Ben

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/

Current thread:

Re: Reverse dns, (continued)
- - - Re: Reverse dns Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 11)
    - Re: Reverse dns Simon Biles (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Danny (Mar 10)
- RE: Reverse dns Edward Ray (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Andrei Zlate-Podani (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 10)
  - Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
    - Re: Reverse dns Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Security - AlaricoWebDesign.it (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Pete Hickey (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Ben McGinnes (Mar 11)
- RE: Reverse dns Mike Ring (Mar 10)
- RE: Reverse dns Dale Babiy (Mar 10)
  - RE: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns derek (Mar 10)
- RE: Reverse dns Andriy Bilous (Mar 11)