Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more...


From: Devdas Bhagat <devdas () dvb homelinux org>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 03:26:12 +0530

On 12/03/05 15:36 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Devdas Bhagat wrote:

Microsoft, Cisco, Juniper, etc., all have both vested interests and public
policy interests in notifying those who would be most affected first.

Which public? Are you a member of the public? Am I?

The public at large.  You , me, everyone you know is "the public".


This is good public policy as well: if the national infrastructure is
compromised, we are all up shit's creek, if Joe's Corner Store is

Which nation? From my PoV, it is the general user who needs to be
informed first. A whole bunch of us have more problems with Windows
holes even though we do not use Windows, simply because of the traffic
volume generated.

Your "view" is perversely slanted towards serving only your own personal
interests, without regard for those around you.

As such, your "view" is worthless, and can be safely discarded.

My PoV is that the infrastructure that I depend on is being impacted by
J.R. User in the US, Korea and Japan because of the flood of crap that
comes from their infected Windows systems to mine. Hint: There is
network infrastructure outside the US.

Regardless of what you think critical infrastructure is, the US
government's PCs are /not/ critical infrastructure. 

Devdas Bhagat
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/


Current thread: