Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance
From: InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 22:58:07 -0800
Why cant you use google to find out this ?
The same reason you can't use Google and find your answer fuckbag.
*In the para 4* "Protecting whistleblowers is an essential component of an ethical and open work environment."
No mention of an anon email address here.
*In para 6* <----- this is the one that you want "Provide Employees Multiple Avenues to Report Concerns" While employees will hopefully feel comfortable raising concerns directly with their supervisors, many employees are reluctant to raise concerns with line management for fear of retaliation, especially where their concerns pertain to unethical or illegal conduct by their line managers. Therefore, nonprofits should provide several options for employees to raise concerns, including the option of raising a concern anonymously.
Again, not specifying email. A simple drop box in the lunchroom facilitates this. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Aditya Deshmukh (Nov 29)
- Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance InfoSecBOFH (Nov 29)
- Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Michael Holstein (Nov 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Kristian Hermansen (Nov 30)
- Re: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance InfoSecBOFH (Nov 30)
- RE: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance Aditya Deshmukh (Nov 30)
- Re: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance InfoSecBOFH (Nov 30)
- Re: Re: SOX whistleblowers' clause Compliance InfoSecBOFH (Nov 30)