Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue
From: Paul Laudanski <zx () castlecops com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:54:40 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Debasis Mohanty wrote:
Paul Laudanski What I'm saying is that the vendor never claimed ZAP versions prior to 5are not vulnerable in the report. Funny Paul!! You are simple exaggerating upon the same point again and again in a new style each time. Well, They don't even say that ZAP versions prior to v5 are vulnerable in their advisory.
Glad I made you laugh. We are at odds in this clearly. Zone Labs aka Cisco imvho has issued a fair and accurate release indicating what is not vulnerable and thereby conversely you know which products are. To that end... I move on. Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security CastleCops(SM), http://castlecops.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Debasis Mohanty (Oct 01)
- Re: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Paul Laudanski (Oct 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Paul Laudanski (Oct 03)
- RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue Paul Laudanski (Oct 03)