Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Call for moderation
From: Dave Alanis <SDALAN04 () smumn edu>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:51:14 -0500
I second to the comment posted below. One of the reasons I joined Full-disclosure was for its raw unmoderated data. On the other hand, If we begin censoring off-topic messages we might as well start banning people by their IP ---> MAC Address :p. I would consider 0x80 () hush ai to be the first person off the list! Say no to censorship!
Moderating lists tends to slow things down but I have seen other security related lists begin to get out of hand and moderation was enforced. It would be nice if people can just get along. Or not get along but for shorter periods of time. There is a charter for this list at http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html (which is in the mailing list sig).
"Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition From Mediocre Minds" - Einstein "Cuanta estupidez en tan poco cerebro!" _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Call for moderation, (continued)
- Re: Call for moderation Daniel Veditz (May 19)
- Re: Call for moderation Valdis . Kletnieks (May 19)
- Re: Call for moderation Andrew Smith (May 19)
- Re: Call for moderation nocfed (May 19)
- Re: Call for moderation Valdis . Kletnieks (May 20)
- Re: Call for moderation Valdis . Kletnieks (May 19)
- Re: Call for moderation Don Bailey (May 20)
- Re: Call for moderation Daniel Veditz (May 19)
- Re: Call for moderation Jason (May 20)
- Re: **SPAM** Re: Call for moderation Aaron Gray (May 20)
- Re: **SPAM** Re: Call for moderation Aaron Gray (May 20)
- Re: **SPAM** Re: Call for moderation bkfsec (May 22)
- Re: Call for moderation Dave Alanis (May 19)
- Re: Call for moderation Steven Rakick (May 19)