Re: RE: OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

[<ninjadaito () hushmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

BRAVO!!!!!  Well done bkfsec!!

It seems that most everybody knows the truth except those still
blinkered by the Neocons and their media brainwashing campaign.

BTW, quite a good related article by Manuel Valenzuela (for those
interested) can be found at: -
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14958.htm

And lastly; wake up Paul!!!

Luv,
Ninja.

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 00:26:15 +1000 bkfsec <bkfsec () sdf lonestar org>
wrote:
> Throwaway1 () columbus rr com wrote:
>
> > It's not a joke Gary.
> > If you are attempting to make the claim that Saddam NEVER had WMD
> you are
> > either Profoundly Misinformed, Astonishingly Ignorant of Late
> 20th Century
> > History; or simply Lying.
> Wow.  How utterly intellectually dishonest of you...
>
> Saying that the Bush administration knowingly lied about Weapons
> of Mass
> Destruction is *NOT* saying that Saddam never had WMD.  What
> planet do
> you live on?  Are you really that fucking dense to believe that
> people
> claiming the administration lied believe Saddam never had WMDs?
>
> This is an old right-wing, dittohead radio talking point from 2003
> that
> never was grounded in reality and shows exactly where you're
> coming from.
>
>
> > We never did find the stockpiles we were looking for. The closest
> we came
> > was a shitload of bunkers filled with nerve agents that were
> still in their
> > unmixed binary form; and some bio-warfare reference strains.
> Disproven... you fell into a hoax yourself.. or really, you bought
> the
> rhetoric which took bits and pieces of a weapons inspection report
> and
> piecemealed it to death until it said "WMDs" when it didn't.
>
>
> > So that means that either damn near every major intelligence
> agency in the
> > world was wrong at the SAME TIME, or Saddam did a better job of
> hidin' 'em
> > than we did of lookin' for 'em.
> Bullshit.  Not all intelligence agencies agreed on the existance
> or
> number of WMDs in his possession.  In fact, there was significant
> disagreement in our own governmental agencies regarding those
> points.
> In fact, our own former weapons inspecters made statements saying
> that
> there's no way he had the levels that we were claiming.  The UN
> weapons
> inspection team disagreed with those figures and, golly gee, they
> might
> have a good reason to have disagreed.
>
> Yet again you dredge up another bullshit right-wing talking point
> that
> is not grounded in reality...
>
> I don't need to listen to you, all I need to do is turn on the
> fucking
> radio and switch to my local fascist propaganda channel.
>
>
> > Now I realize that there are a lot of people who don't like GWB.
> That's
> > fine with me. Not my problem. What IS my problem is those same
> people
> > sacrificing LOGIC and COMMON SENSE on the alter of their rage at
> Bush and
> > as a result perpetuating a completely false history of the past 5-
> 6 years.
> >
> Bullshit. You know what's sacrificing logic and common sense?
> Ignoring
> the facts in front of you, which is precisely what you're doing.
>
> Common sense says that there's no way he could have still had WMDs
> that
> our own people destroyed.  Common sense says you question the
> validity
> of sources used to provide proof.  Common sense says you interpret
> all
> of the data, not piecemeal specific portions of it.
>
> You say you have a problem with people creating a conclusion and
> picking
> and choosing evidence to support it?  How ironic that that's
> precisely
> what the Bush administration did.  You'd have to be a moron not to
> see
> that at this point.  And not only that, but at this point you're
> not
> just a moron, you're also a hypocrite for defending the Bush
> administration for doing precisely what you're accusing the rest
> of us
> for doing.
>
> Hey buddy, you chose the wrong side.  Don't take it out on us.
>
>             -bkfsec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
Version: Hush 2.5

wkYEARECAAYFAkUIcYcACgkQtM6vtsm2y1sw1wCgrEGchQG4olPuMEN9XH9yuazF05IA
mwfFKaKF7E10VNmS8pREobW9v5i+
=rUQz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required
http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480

Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail
https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/