Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Anti-Virus vendors prove less-effective
From: "David Kierznowski" <david.kierznowski () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:33:50 -0400
James, this is the problem with AV in general and not specific to this problem. detecting the problem & defense in depth mitigates zero-day, however, when very basic code gets past AV this is definitely an area that needs work. 24/04/07, James Matthews <nytrokiss () gmail com> wrote:
How can these people put out a good product against scripts where you can change anything and it will still work! On 4/24/07, David Kierznowski <david.kierznowski () gmail com> wrote:Web Backdoor Compilation along with Dancho Danchev AV research has proven how less-effective many of these products are when detecting web malware. The results are certainly not a shocker but definately an eye opener. WBC has certainly demonstrated what all security researchers already know,thisarea needs work! See: http://michaeldaw.org/news/news-042407/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-- http://www.goldwatches.com/watches.asp?Brand=39 http://www.wazoozle.com
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Anti-Virus vendors prove less-effective David Kierznowski (Apr 24)
- Re: Anti-Virus vendors prove less-effective James Matthews (Apr 24)
- Re: Anti-Virus vendors prove less-effective Nick FitzGerald (Apr 24)
- Re: Anti-Virus vendors prove less-effective David Kierznowski (Apr 25)
- Re: Anti-Virus vendors prove less-effective James Matthews (Apr 24)