Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: DOS on phrack?
From: scott <redhowlingwolves () bellsouth net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 00:17:41 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Possibly because I am a paranoid phreak who thinks security is a way to get around this problem? Or just maybe I should have added...or just down for maintenance?...to my original post.That way smart asses like yourself wouldn't need to waste their time responding to such a despot as me. Sorry to waste your time so you could waste more time by replying in such an unambiguous way! Ooops.There's my Xanax.I knew I needed it! Bad day.Sorry for the rant.^~^ scott Jeff MacDonald wrote:
why is it that when a website is unavailable, the immediate assumption is that is being attacked? regards,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGhym+elSgjADJQKsRAnb2AKCHs26MXM13jhcme1niZLgMobnsCACdGlXr 4xLSTKdsdcb5HfMkAfrFgbU= =+9Si -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: DOS on phrack? scott (Jul 01)
- Re: DOS on phrack? Jeff MacDonald (Jul 01)