Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 29, Issue 51

[shadown <shadown () gmail com>]

Dear List,

Please don't do more paranoia about my mail.
YES, it was my mistake, ok? I'm human after all as you all are too. This
is not my first mistake and it won't be the last for sure either.
I ask for apologies for the inconvenient caused by my mistake.

Cheers,
  Sergio

full-disclosure-request () lists grok org uk wrote:
> Send Full-Disclosure mailing list submissions to
>       full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       full-disclosure-request () lists grok org uk
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       full-disclosure-owner () lists grok org uk
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Full-Disclosure digest..."
>
>
> Note to digest recipients - when replying to digest posts, please trim your post appropriately. Thank you.
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Hash (Peter Besenbruch)
>    2. Re: Hash (Tremaine Lea)
>    3. Re: Hash (gjgowey () tmo blackberry net)
>    4. Re: Hash (Tremaine Lea)
>    5. Re: Hash (Joey Mengele)
>    6. Re: Hash (Dee??n Chakravarth?)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:52:15 -1000
> From: Peter Besenbruch <prb () lava net>
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
> To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> Message-ID: <46A95DDF.5050806 () lava net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Tremaine Lea wrote:
> > Sure, it's possible.  Possibly Sergio is lazy.  As he sent it via  
> > gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible  
> > it happened in his mail client.
>
> And he still could have, and should have edited it.
>
> > And all of that aside, who cares?  We see signatures like that all  
> > the time on mailing lists.  It's pretty obvious they're useless in  
> > this context.
>
> Useless in any context. Sigs. like that are very unprofessional. Even if 
> I know they are nonsense, such disclaimers come across as mildly bullying.

-- 
Sergio Alvarez
Security, Research & Development
IT Security Consultant
email: shadown () gmail com


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/