Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:46:25 -0400
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:13:19 EDT, Brad Spengler said:
Ingo knows about this (I mailed him privately about the problems I saw with Fedora Core 3, which resulted in an updated kernel -- though I
Dude, Fedora Core 3 was like 2 frikking years ago. I suppose it's OK for us to diss the grsecurity patch today because there were bugs in 2.1.5? (I have a grsecurity-2.1.5-2.6.11.9-200505121617.patch.gz hanging around which dates back to just about the same time as FC3 was released). Now if you want to discuss the execshield implementation that's currently shipping in FC6 or the about-to-escape FC7, we'll be more than happy to listen.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Brad Spengler (May 14)
- Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 14)
- Re: [Dailydave] What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Steve Grubb (May 14)
- Re: [Dailydave] What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Brad Spengler (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX) Brad Spengler (May 14)