Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Hushmail == Narqz
From: "Peter Dawson" <slash.pd () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:17:04 -0500
"We both agree Hushmail deserves credit for its frank and open replies<http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/hush_klp.pdf>(.pdf). Such candor is hard to come by these days, especially since most ISPs won't even tell you how long they hold onto your IP address or if they sell your web-surfing habits to the highest bidders." Did HushMail inform their users that their emails were goin to be handed over to government agencies ?? Yeah it kewl to be nice to the MSM and Fed's but what about the user (s) ?? /pd On Nov 8, 2007 1:43 PM, Paul Melson <pmelson () gmail com> wrote:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/11/encrypted-e-mai.html I thought it seemed a little quiet on fd today. :-) PaulM _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Hushmail == Narqz Paul Melson (Nov 08)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz Peter Dawson (Nov 08)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz adnan habib (Nov 08)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz Simon Smith (Nov 08)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz php0t (Nov 08)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz Michael Bann (Nov 08)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz Byron Sonne (Nov 09)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz Simon Smith (Nov 09)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz Micheal Espinola Jr (Nov 09)
- Re: Hushmail == Narqz php0t (Nov 08)