Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: defining 0day
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:59:59 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Brian Loe wrote:
On 9/25/07, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean. What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of previous definitions?Seems to me that definitions, and language itself, is a product of evolution. You can't just remove all previous meanings. Its better anyway to stick to the most accepted, acknowledged and DOCUMENTED definitions:
No longer good enough. We can get a press scare over a public vuln release, or a wake-up call. I think we can do better as an industry. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows, (continued)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Steven Adair (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Casper . Dik (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows J. Oquendo (Sep 21)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Crispin Cowan (Sep 23)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Chad Perrin (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Lamont Granquist (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Roland Kuhn (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Thor (Hammer of God) (Sep 25)
- defining 0day Gadi Evron (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Brian Loe (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Gadi Evron (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Brian Loe (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Epic (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Adrian Griffis (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Brian Loe (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Andrew Weaver (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day don bailey (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Charles Miller (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Gadi Evron (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day scott (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Zow (Sep 27)