Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: defining bugtraq
From: "worried security" <worriedsecurity () googlemail com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:11:56 +0100
On 9/26/07, jf <jf () danglingpointers net> wrote: also fuck pdp and gnucitizen, the only amazing part is that he has gotten anyone to take him serious. no, gnucitizen is a respected member of the security community. if gnucitizen had released the 0day in full, there would be all sorts of *worm within days* by the media. no, i think gnucitizen has done a good deed. he has stopped vrius writers from building a worm and compromising systems. i very much respect the folks at gnucitizen, they are heros and are doing the right thing by doing a *staggered disclosure*. i think from his point of view he wanted to get the word out there he has 0day, just incase someone else discovered the same hole after him and posted it on the mailing lists, he wanted to get in there first before other folks. its all about credit where its due, i thank gnucitizen for *staggered disclosure*. its all about damage limitation, and i think gnucitizen are good people.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- defining bugtraq worried security (Sep 26)
- Re: defining bugtraq jf (Sep 26)
- Re: defining bugtraq worried security (Sep 26)
- Re: defining bugtraq jf (Sep 26)