Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online
From: "James Matthews" <nytrokiss () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:58:41 -0700
It is the equivalent of saying that people should stop making defence technology because we don't have to have any more wars! On 9/26/07, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:44:13 PDT, James Matthews said:Why isn't there a lobby against this!It's terribly hard to lobby something sensible, if the legislator in question has bought into the "The Four Horsemen(*) of the Internet Must Be Stopped" meme. (*) Terrorists, drug dealers, child pornographers, and copyright infringers. Why all 4 are considered equally bad is beyond me...
-- http://www.goldwatches.com/mens/cufflinks.html http://www.jewelerslounge.com
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online full-disclosure (Sep 26)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online James Matthews (Sep 26)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online James Matthews (Sep 26)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online gjgowey (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online full-disclosure (Sep 26)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] n.runs AG puts §202 law to the test - Tools back online James Matthews (Sep 26)