Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?!
From: "Mike C" <mike.cartall () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:27:26 +0530
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Memisyazici, Aras <arasm () vt edu> wrote:
<snip> M$ should just bite the incompatibility bullet and turn NTLM off </snip>
No! not without losing a big big advantage it enjoys over other platforms. This will render god-knows-how-many binary apps useless and reduce the value of the windows ecosystem. If I were Microsoft, I'd really consider hard before such a decision.. see what packaging hell Linux's binary incompatibility has taken it. -- MC
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?!, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! James Matthews (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Paul Schmehl (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! James Matthews (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Paul Schmehl (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Paul Schmehl (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Charles Morris (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Kurt Grutzmacher (Nov 25)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Mike C (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Paul Schmehl (Nov 26)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Eric Rachner (Nov 27)
- Re: Microsoft takes 7 years to 'solve' a problem?! Eric Rachner (Nov 27)