Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: security industry software license


From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:16:48 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:43 PM, rysheve <rysheve () gmail com> wrote:

So are you talking about Actionable Intelligence? Why should the
government be gathering any intelligence on me unless I am the target
of an investigation? Maybe I should also have to register my I.D. to
any device that I connect to the Internet. I bet that would provide
lost of actionable intelligence.


For what it's worth, the FBI now does not need a reason to investigate
anyone:

http://centerforinvestigativereporting.org/blogpost/20081006broaderfbipower
snowsetinstone

Enjoy!

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFI9AEJq1pz9mNUZTMRApMnAJ4qz8Yw8ZQkHtQw6Auy1Xv5jYf5DgCZAQ4F
1BH2jnYX0Gu/orDEFVpWFSI=
=YA/A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: