Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Why FD should unban n3td3v.


From: Lane Christiansen <lanec42 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:07:15 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

To: Full-Disclosure
At: Sun Aug 30 23:05:55 CDT 2009

I agree completely. n3td3v et. al. annoy me, but I like freedom of speech. ;)

“Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a
hallmark of an authoritarian regime.” --Potter Stewart
      _
      ))   ___  _ _  __
     ((__ ((_( ((\( (('
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqbTCMACgkQv5kzl5yG7jcikQCdFg7fvyyfB8tW4250CduLiHKp
k24Ani6X2SlLQYfEM8QEN3YgywSpNPNo
=nzRh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 8:56 PM, John Q Publix<johnqpublicr () hush com> wrote:
Some of you may call n3td3v annoying, others may call him funny,
but others may genuinely value his comments on the list.

Leave it up to the reader to decide.

FD exists to be unmoderated and uncensored. This list is a great
thing, and I'm requesting that it be restored to it's former glory.

While I'm no fan of n3td3v, censoring him sets a dangerous
precedent. If I wanted to filter out his mails client-side, I still
could btw.

Just don't censor him on the server.


Just my 2 cents.

john q public

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: