Re: AntiAntiSec / Endgame

[Tamber Krain <james.penketh () googlemail com>]

Cance Consulting wrote:
> a. Stop publishing exploits (ook fair enough, but if this stops,they 
> still get traded privately, leading to a small circle of people
> having 
> control of a large number of internet hosts). 

And if this small circle includes anti-sec, then they have a lot less
competition from the rest of the skiddies on the net.

> b. Their mantra of "it's all about money" is two sided as I'm sure
> they 
> are compensated in some way for their time and effort in pulling off 
> this (pretty cool) feat.

I think it is indeed about the money... If you combine the two points
above (this in just my opinion, and I could be vastly wrong, but that's
nothing out of the ordinary. ;] ), then maybe anti-sec wants all those
vulnerable hosts to themselves.
With the lack of competition from the skiddies they could amass quite a
large number of compromised hosts, which they could then rent out to
spammers/etc. like any other botnet.


> c. They think that by spreading "fear" exploits and other security 
> related articles will stop popping up on the internet?! Why? Wouldn't 
> this activity of theirs only promote further full-disclosure and 
> awareness of security protocol?

Because, obviously, they've threatened to rm everyone who stands between
them and world domination^W^W^W^W^W^Wpublishes exploits. And, naturally,
because they are so great and powerful, everyone will immediately
comply.


...or just laugh and go about their business as ususal. ;)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/