Re: iiscan results - a closer look

[dd () sucuri net]

I played with it a little yesterday and posted my thoughts (as well as
a summary of their whole scan) at:

http://blog.sucuri.net/2010/01/closer-look-at-iiscan.html

It is a nice tool with some good checks looking for SQL, XSS, etc... I
just think they
didn't look deep enough in my site to check more stuff...


--dd



On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Robin Sage <robin.sage () rocketmail com> wrote:
> If anyone has any more invite codes please send one to me.
> I tried the ones posted and they were not functional.
> I also emailed support and never received a response.
>
> Has anyone compared this to AppScan, WebInspect, Sentinnel, Qualys or
> Acunetix ?
> How many trials do you get per invite code? Just 1 app?
>
> Thanks!
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jardel Weyrich <jweyrich () gmail com>
> To: p8x <l () p8x net>
> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> Sent: Thu, January 7, 2010 9:33:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] iiscan results
>
> It's probably trying to get different results/responses by changing
> the values of some request headers. The most common scenario, as far
> as I've seen, and as oddly as it might sound, is the User-Agent and
> HTTP minor version.
>
> A more verbose logging strategy would demystify. Or maybe Vincent?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/