Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability
From: paul.szabo () sydney edu au
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 21:19:44 +1000
Dear Marsh, Personal opinions (hoping not to start a flame war) on your questions:
A. Does anyone think there would be much gained by me requesting (or insisting on) a CVE number?
I do not see the need for CVEs for such "trivial" (easily verifiable) problems. I find them useful when problems or fixes are reported in "obscure" software (e.g. in binary-only proprietary distributions), so as to identify same-known-problem reports.
B. Does anybody actually care about local escalations any more, or is everyone just expected to have their very own personal virtual private cloud for a security boundary?
We each must protect our own cocoons. Saving the world is impossible. Cheers, Paul Paul Szabo psz () maths usyd edu au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Henri Salo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Marsh Ray (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 14)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Marsh Ray (May 15)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Leif Nixon (May 14)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability paul . szabo (May 13)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Georgi Guninski (May 14)
- Re: Mathematica on Linux /tmp/MathLink vulnerability Henri Salo (May 13)