Re: go public to avoid jail

[Ed Carp <erc () pobox com>]

There were excerpts in the Wired article, and there are more in the
court record - I'll see if I can find the link in my browser history.
Quite interesting reading, actually...

On 5/3/10, J Roger <securityhocus () gmail com> wrote:
> > I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than
> > what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all).
>
> I know this is the Internet but you don't need to be quite so rude. Perhaps
> I just haven't been arrested (caught) as many times as you have.
>
> If you read
> > the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the
> > motive was.
>
> I have not seen these IRC logs. Have you? Could you provide a reference for
> them please?
>
>
> JRoger
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Ed Carp <erc () pobox com> wrote:
>
> > I can see that you have no experience with the legal system other than
> > what you've seen on TV (which is, to say, none at all).  If you read
> > the IRC logs presented by the prosecution, it is pretty clear what the
> > motive was.  Your "release it to the public and you have no liability"
> > argument will land you in prison if you try it - go to any attorney
> > and ask.  Your emotional "prove Stephen is a saint" attempt at
> > twisting what happens in the legal system doesn't change the FACT that
> > the burden of proof was easily met by the prosecution and that the
> > defense's arguments, while designed to sway people more used to
> > emotional appeals than logic, did little to impress the court, with
> > very predictable results.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/