Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:30:15 +0100
Don't troll people, troll! On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:09 PM, T Biehn <tbiehn () gmail com> wrote:
a+ troll. -Travis On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com>wrote:Only thing, there's the danger of someone using stolen certificates. But I'm sure there's another fix for that. In my opinion, all in all, you're creating a yet another overly complex system with as yet more possible flaws. Don't forget tat each new line of code is a potential attack vector which affects any system. Just my 2 cents... Chris. On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Mario Vilas <mvilas () gmail com> wrote:Just signing the update packages prevents this attack, so it's not that hard to fix. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 5:02 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:43:14 +0800, Jacky Jack said:It's now a time for vendors to re-consider their updating scheme.And do what differently, exactly? OK, so it's *possible* to fake out the iTunes update process. But which is easier and more productive: A) Laying in wait for some random to think "Wow, I should update iTunes" and hijack the process. B) Send out a few hundred thousand spam with a ' From:update () apple-itunes-support com<From%3Aupdate () apple-itunes-support com> ' with a link to a site you control and feed the the sheep some malware. Evilgrade looks like a nice tool to have if you're doing a pen test or a targeted attack and can somehow get the victim to do an update (possibly social engineering), but for any software vendor feeding software updates to Joe Sixpack this threat model is *so* far down the list it isn't funny. Simply compare the number of boxes pwned by (A) and (B) - how many people have gotten pwned because somebody hijacked their update from Symantec or wherever, compared to the number pwned because they got a popup that said "Your computer is infected, click here to fix it"? Remember - just because a new tool useful for an attacker shows up, does *not* mean it's a game changer for the industry at large. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-- HONEY: I want to… put some powder on my nose. GEORGE: Martha, won’t you show her where we keep the euphemism? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/-- FD1D E574 6CAB 2FAF 2921 F22E B8B7 9D0D 99FF A73C http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=tbiehn&op=index&fingerprint=on http://pastebin.com/f6fd606da
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back Mario Vilas (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back Jeffrey Walton (Nov 01)
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back Christian Sciberras (Nov 01)
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back Jhfjjf Hfdsjj (Nov 01)
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back Jeffrey Walton (Nov 01)
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back Jhfjjf Hfdsjj (Nov 01)
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back T Biehn (Nov 02)
- Re: Evilgrade 2.0 - the update explotation framework is back Christian Sciberras (Nov 02)