Re: NiX - Linux Brute Forcer (the beast) has been released!]]

[nix () myproxylists com]

> In all fairness I do use proxychains for all of my proxy randomization and
> all that kind of stuff if I need it. That way it's consistent regardless
> of what I throw at it, even tools without random proxy chaining like nmap
> and hydra.

I am of course aware of proxychains as i use it myself. But lets get back
to one feature: Auto-removal of dead or unreliable proxy and when site
protection mechanism blocks the proxy

That is not possible using proxychains. A less your program depends on
other programs, the better. I am not saying, ten points to THC for coding
it in pure C.

I could not find any kind of FORM support from hydra, i have put a good
amount of time to FORM auto-detection logic as well (very good for less
advanced users).

Some people have asked what advantages NiX offers over other tools, this
question should have been answered now.

> Good job coding it though, I can't imagine that was easy.
> Ryan

Thanks, really difficult and time consuming project but i have verified it
to be stable (45k combolist and over 1000 proxies).

PS. If any of you downloaded yesterday 1.0.0 version, please download
immediately the latest 1.0.1 version is i forgot to fix something
important (told in CHANGELOG) before i packed the release version.

If you find a bug, just let me know and i try to fix it asap.

> On Nov 13, 2010, at 3:36 PM, nix () myproxylists com wrote:
>
> > > Le vendredi 12 novembre 2010 Ã  21:47 +0200, nix () myproxylists com a
> > > écrit :
> > > > Where is for example FORM auto-detection for those
> > > > other tools? Where is SOCKS4 proxy support? Where is proxy
> > > > randomization?
> > > > Where is logic to drop dead proxies? Where is logic for
> > > > fake-detection?
> > >
> > > Then, you should have started by that, it is that simple.
> > > We are all busy and you can't expect anyone to even have a look on
> > > your
> > > tool or link if you don't highlight how different it is from others or
> > > why you did it.
> > >
> > > As far as I am concerned, these features may be nice, but I don't need
> > > them and will stick to Medusa for the brute force tests I run from
> > > time
> > > to time (ie not often, a few times a year at most).
> > > But, to make it clear, it is just my personal opinion, I am not saying
> > > that your tool is not interesting or useless.
> >
> > I just gave a test-run for Hydra against my own site and noticed:
> >
> > It does support only single proxy, any site that has even a bit
> > protection
> > will defeat it. NiX does support HTTP/SOCKS4/SOCKS5 (as much as you
> > have
> > working proxies) with randomization etc. This is significant advantage
> > over any other tool.
> >
> > I have worked 1.5 months constantly on NiX, after i have had a little
> > break. I will implement support for other major protocols which is now
> > really easy after having otherwise working engine.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/