Re: wikileaks still under attack, pressure revved up

[PsychoBilly <zpamh0l3 () gmail com>]

1+ propaganda victim ( man! you're a hacker, don't you remember? )

[[   Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]   ]] @ [[   21/10/2010 23:59   
]]--------------------------------------------------
> I apologise for this, I had heard this in, what I had believed to be, a credible news report.

1+ truthfull obviousness

[[   Jeffrey Walton   ]] @ [[   21/10/2010 19:08   ]]--------------------------------------------------
> Hi Cal,
> If the troops weren't there, then the troops would not be at risk, and
> there would be no wiki leaks story. quod erat demonstrandum.

Moreover.
1 unique media is giving factuals datas.
Others medias are dressing reality like lil girls play dolls.

The troops in dangers we're talking about
goes out in heavily armored apache helicopter, or Kombat-grade Light tanks
Then ( sometimes ) make strawberry milk-shakes with civilians, because one of them is handling
" what could be interprated as a weapon "

Guess, who's the most at risk, here?

Should we consider releasing war.logs, and thus speed up troops.withdrawal process, a mess?
I believe the opposite.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/