Re: [Full-disclosure] (this thread is now about porn).‏

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:49:46 PST, "andrew.wallace" said:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Rankin, James R <kz20fl () googlemail com> wrote:
> > I am an alter ego of netty's that he has invented to argue with in case the voices in his head stop talking about 
> > national security

> The right to free expression can be restricted if this is necessary to protect
> the reputation of others. The law of defamation allows persons who consider
> that their reputation has been or may be harmed by statements made by others to
> sue for damages or to prevent the making of those statments.
> http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/right-of-free-expression/defamation/index.html

> You're treading on very thin ice.

Fortunately for Andrew, the offense of barratry was apparently abolished
in Great Britain in 1967.  It may however still survive as a cause for a tort.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/