Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: What the f*** is going on?
From: jf <jf () ownco net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:27:29 -0500
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 01:20:32PM -0800, Michal Zalewski wrote:
this is only true for remote attackers hitting network service auth.Mhmm, and runas, su et al couldn't benefit from this?Not a whole lot. You can likely tell a successful login from a failed one within several miliseconds by watching /proc or so.
I'd agree that remote auth obviously benefits more; but I'm not sure that an implementation issue entirely invalidates the point. Also, IIRC you can just ^C back to the shell instead of waiting on su to timeout. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: What the f*** is going on?, (continued)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? coderman (Feb 22)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? jf (Feb 22)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? Michal Zalewski (Feb 22)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? Michal Zalewski (Feb 22)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? Chris Evans (Feb 22)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? Paul Schmehl (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? jf (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? coderman (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? jf (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? Michal Zalewski (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? jf (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? jf (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? jf (Feb 24)
- Re: What the f*** is going on? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)