Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Gmail and China's GFW
From: Cal Leeming <cal () foxwhisper co uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:20:02 +0000
Agreed ;p On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, bk <chort0 () gmail com> wrote:
On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Cal Leeming wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:39 PM, bk <chort0 () gmail com> wrote:On Mar 21, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Alien Chatter wrote:$ sudo iptables -I INPUT -m string --algo bm --hex-string'|476f6f676c6520496e63311830160603550403140f6d61696c2e676f6f676c652e636f6d30819f30|'-j DROP Try it, you will get a connection timeout: $ curl --connect-timeout 60 https://mail.google.com/ curl: (28) SSL connection timeout The same applies for Twitter, Facebook... Much more efficient than DNS/IP blocking!Because searching for a bytestring in payload generates so much less load than just overriding a DNS result at the recursive server (that users are forced to issue queries to) or a simply drop SYNs based on IP header value that routers/firewalls are optimized for... I think you forgot your coffee this morning. It's not just for aliens you know. -- chort _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/I think what he meant by efficient, was that if their sites ever get re-numbered or more end nodes are added (which may or may not be that often), then this would still catch the connections. Imho, I think it'd be better to just have a script checking for it, but nether the less, it's a cute approach (albeit, probably not usable in a production environment). It's "efficient" in that humans get to be lazy. It's not efficient as far as hardware resource utilization. -- chort
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Gmail and China's GFW Alien Chatter (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW bk (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW Cal Leeming (Mar 22)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW bk (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW Cal Leeming (Mar 22)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW Cal Leeming (Mar 22)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW bk (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW nix (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW nix (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW bk (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW nix (Mar 21)
- Re: Gmail and China's GFW Cal Leeming (Mar 22)