Re: Linksys Routers still Vulnerable to Wps vulnerability.

[Dan Kaminsky <dan () doxpara com>]

That's a fairly significant finding.  Can anyone else confirm the existence
of devices that still fall to Reaver even when WPS is disabled?

Chris, when you run:

iw scan wlan0 | grep “Config methods”

Do you see a difference in advertised methods?

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:58 PM, chris nelson <sleekmountaincat () gmail com>wrote:

> i have tested reaver on a netgear and linksys (dont have model nos. with
> me) with wps disabled and enabled. the wps setting did not matter and both
> were vulnerable. was able to recover wpa2 passphrase in ~4 hrs on both.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Dan Kaminsky <dan () doxpara com> wrote:
>
> > Steve while he's often derided goes into this very well.  Many cisco's
> > > only stop advertising wps when it is "off" but wps actually still
> > > exists...which means they are still easily hackable.
> >
> > Have you directly confirmed a WPS exchange can occur even on devices that
> > aren't advertising support?  That would indeed be a quick and dirty way to
> > "turn the feature off".
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/