Re: Pligg 0.9/1.x remote code execution

[BlackHawk <hawkgotyou () gmail com>]

they should not have been fixed, as when exploit has been released they
where not and looking at SVN no change has been made (
http://pligg.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pligg/ )
no CVE has been asked for this vuln (at least from me), so none should has
been assigned.
And regarding your post been deleted: it's a common practice for the head
of Pligg to try hiding bugs of his CMS instead of encouraging responsible
disclosing them ( that's why exploit has been released in the wild ).

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Henri Salo <henri () nerv fi> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 06:34:46PM +0200, BlackHawk wrote:
> > Exploit attached, info inside. 2.0 versions could still be affected
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/MSXFSvzA
>
> Do you know if these issues have been fixed in some version of Pligg and
> if these have CVE-identifiers? I tried to ask this from forum.pligg.com,
> but my post was removed.
>
> - Henri Salo



-- 
BlackHawk - hawkgotyou () gmail com

Remembered not as a messenger,
remembered not as a reformer,
not as a prophet, not as a hero,
not even as Sebastian.
Remembered only…as Jack.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/