Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Should openssl accept weak DSA/DH keys with g = +/- 1 ?


From: Hanno Böck <hanno () hboeck de>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:23:08 +0200

On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:44:00 +0300
Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com> wrote:

AFAICT weak DH keys can't be recognized
since they can be well formed.

Yes, I'm aware of that, has recently been discussed on the TLS WG list
also. But clients could (and should imho) reject obviously bogus
parameters like 8 bit moduli sizes.

The solution would be to change TLS to have a fixed set of "known good"
DH parameters written in the spec. This is also what the authors of the
triple handshake attack have proposed. Would also save traffic because
servers wouldn't have to send the DH parameter set, just an identifier.
But probably won't happen before TLS 1.3.


-- 
Hanno Böck
http://hboeck.de/

mail/jabber: hanno () hboeck de
GPG: BBB51E42

Attachment: signature.asc
Description:


_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Current thread: