Re: Hilariously Bad SQRL Implementation

[Sanguinarious <Sanguinarious () OccultusTerra com>]

Why would any sane rational human being implement something from
Gibson? I still remember him saying how implementing raw sockets in
Windows XP will totally and utterly destroy the entire internet. I
would implement time proven solutions based on real world testing not
an experimental solution from a rather dubious source.

I suppose, as an interesting side project, it might be interesting to
explore but for production, I wouldn't touch with a million foot
stick.


On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Scott Arciszewski
<kobrasrealm () gmail com> wrote:
> If any of you are familiar with Stephen Gibson's SQRL protocol for user
> authentication (really neat idea), you might have come across this PHP
> implementation before: https://github.com/geir54/php-sqrl
>
> Unfortunately, this library is actually pretty terrible. Not only does it
> pass all of the data off to a Heroku app to perform the signature
> verification, it is also vulnerable to SQL Injection:
>
> https://github.com/geir54/php-sqrl/blob/0fa574520a1843a33a84c3985f934e84af6f2042/sqrl_verify.php#L39-59
>
> I thought about submitting a pull request to fix this, but I don't believe
> there is honestly much here to salvage. So, I'm writing my own
> implementation here:
>
> https://github.com/darkitecht/php-sqrl <- Not ready, at all, for even beta
> testing.
>
> P.S. Also, it uses mt_rand() for challenge generation in a crypto library.
> Tsk tsk.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/