Re: A question for the list - WordPress plugin inspections

[Jerome Athias <athiasjerome () gmail com>]

Yes

btw you can simply submit by email to osvdb, packetstorm, etc.
but I'm pretty sure they will catch it now ;)

2014-02-20 Harry Metcalfe <harry () dxw com>:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> The criteria are here:
>
> https://security.dxw.com/about/plugin-inspections/
>
> Is that what you mean?
>
> I agree using a common classification would be good. I'll have a look into
> that.
>
> As mentioned before, though - these are not vulnerability reports. We do
> those too:
>
> https://security.dxw.com/advisories/xss-and-csrf-in-user-domain-whitelist-v1-4/
>
> and they are more detailed. Inspections are more about code smell, if you
> know what I mean. So there aren't specific files, lines, etc.
>
> Harry
>
>
>
> On 20/02/2014 08:39, Jerome Athias wrote:
> > It is valuable
> > I concur (# line of code, file names and CVE submission).
> >
> > I would also suggest to use common classifications (or a mapping) such
> > as OWASP TOP10, WASC, CWE (CAPEC) for your criterias.
> >
> > Providing details regarding the methodology or/and tools used for the
> > assessment would be also valuable.
> > (i.e. Checklist, RIPS,
> > https://labs.portcullis.co.uk/tools/wordpress-build-review-tool/ )
> >
> > Thank you
> > Best regards
> >
> > 2014-02-19 Seth Arnold <seth.arnold () canonical com>:
> > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:40:51PM +0000, Harry Metcalfe wrote:
> > > > We write and publish light-touch inspections of WordPress plugins
> > > > that we do for our clients. They are just a guide - we conduct some
> > > > basic checks, not a thorough review.
> > > >
> > > > Would plugins which fail this inspection be of general interest to
> > > > the list and therefore worth posting, as we would a vulnerability?
> > > >
> > > > Here's an example report:
> > > >
> > > >    https://security.dxw.com/plugins/gd-star-rating-1-9-22/
> > > >
> > > > Grateful for a steer...
> > >
> > > That's a very nice summary view, but it'd be more useful in this medium
> > > if you included the lines of code that introduce the vulnerabilities.
> > >
> > > Most useful would be to coordinate with authors and MITRE for CVE numbers
> > > for the issues you find to ensure the issues aren't forgotten about or
> > > otherwise ignored.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/