Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian
From: Bzzz <lazyvirus () gmx com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:04:31 +0100
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:14:10 +0100 Anonymous <anonymous () hoi-polloi org> wrote:
Since the GSM f/w controls a radio, and thus the power, it may need a FCC certification. In which case you would need someone to finance the certification every time a new version of the Gnu firmware is released (FSF perhaps?).
No, in most countries this was taken in account and rejected by the authorities because the certification is tied to the electronics apparatus and not to the software/firmware that drives it (with the frequency range exception in the mobile domain, but this is already covered by other rules than certification). For once, authorities where quite wise (but don't take that for granted in other domains;) JY -- If women were good, God would have one. If they were trusted, Satan wouldn't have horns. -- Coluche _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian coderman (Jan 01)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Lodewijk andré de la porte (Jan 01)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian coderman (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian coderman (Jan 01)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Anonymous (Jan 06)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Bzzz (Jan 06)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Daniel Corbe (Jan 07)
- Re: Open phones for privacy/anonymity applications, Guardian Lodewijk andré de la porte (Jan 01)