Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: AV scan on read vs write debate....
From: Yoann Gini <yoann.gini () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:45:57 +0200
Le 30 juin 2014 à 01:48, Reindl Harald <h.reindl () thelounge net> a écrit :
but if you are talk with Apple "the OS is secure" priests forget it, they are learning resistent
This is not true anymore. Any Apple representative wont tell you that nowadays. Even more, Apple has a small antivirus builtin in the system. But signatures based, focused on major OS X threats. No heuristics, no detection of windows malwares. Le 30 juin 2014 à 01:38, Exibar <exibar () thelair com> a écrit :
they claim they have a huge performance improvement with scan on read turned off...
This is also true. Sadly. I work only on Apple products (and I use antivirus), I never seen a good product who don’t slow down the computer as shit. From a sys admin perspective, Antivirus editors don’t take the Mac seriously, their product are slow and sometime published with too much bug inside. That don’t help Mac users to have any trust in it…
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
_______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Current thread:
- Re: AV scan on read vs write debate.... Yoann Gini (Jul 01)
- Re: AV scan on read vs write debate.... Joe Brown (Jul 01)
- Re: AV scan on read vs write debate.... Reindl Harald (Jul 01)
- Re: AV scan on read vs write debate.... Victor Aguilar (Jul 05)
- Re: AV scan on read vs write debate.... Reindl Harald (Jul 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AV scan on read vs write debate.... Carlos P (Jul 01)
- Re: AV scan on read vs write debate.... Joe Brown (Jul 01)