Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Should it be better ...
From: Brandon Perry <bperry.volatile () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:43:21 -0500
Thank you for bringing this up. When posting my information, I was actually assuming a brief description with links was preferred if you were so inclined to read after a summary. I, for one, didn't grow up on those types of lists and had never even looked at bugtraq from that early on. I also think it is easy for someone my age, whom may have been using some of the same links for content for years, to make assumptions that a link will be good for an indefinitely-extended period of time. I am really glad you brought this point up. I actually got lost for a couple hours reading old bugtraq after you posted this and it is absolutely fascinating. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Fyodor <fyodor () nmap org> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Pablo <paa.listas () gmail com> wrote:[Would] it be better to include the Advisory Details/exploit/code in the body of the email to FD, and not in a link to a blog/site/company so the list archive will be an archive and not a index to some, possible down, link?Yes, it is absolutely better to include full details in the body of the message rather than just a link. I haven't been rejecting the link-only messages (as long as there is at least a brief summary), but they are annoying. Not only are they a pain to read (need to open a browser and/or follow a link), but they screw up the archives. Right now we're able to browse Bugtraq from more than 20 years ago, and it's fascinating: http://seclists.org/bugtraq/1993/Nov/index.html But if those messages were just links to other sites, how many would still work? Hardly any. Now it's perfectly fine to ALSO include a link to the advisory on a web site. Just include full details in the body of the post too. The main exception is binary attachments. If an attachment is more than 500K or a megabyte, just link it that attachment (in the descriptive text body of your post) to avoid clogging up people's mail spools. Also, if you're posting someone else's work (like a news story or 3rd party blog or whatever), there may be copyright issues with just pasting the whole thing into your message. Still, try to include at least the first few paragraphs or a summary so we know what it is. Thanks, Fyodor _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
-- http://volatile-minds.blogspot.com -- blog http://www.volatileminds.net -- website _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Current thread:
- Should it be better ... Pablo (Jul 10)
- Re: Should it be better ... Fyodor (Jul 10)
- Re: Should it be better ... Brandon Perry (Jul 10)
- Re: Should it be better ... Pablo (Jul 18)
- Re: Should it be better ... Fyodor (Jul 10)