funsec mailing list archives
RE: How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:12:02 -0500
Plugins actually first showed up in Netscape Navigator in the mid '90s with the <EMBED> tag. I also wonder if plugins were turned off completely, would people really miss them? Non-HTML content can always be viewed in a separate application. For example, I long ago turned off PDF viewing in a Web browser window because of reliably problems with Acrobat Reader. I have found that things work a whole lot better if a fresh copy of Acrobat Reader is fired up for each PDF file. Richard -----Original Message----- From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 12:03 PM To: Florian Weimer Cc: Richard M. Smith; funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:39:54 +0100, Florian Weimer said:
I don't understand W3C's involvement, either. Plugins threaten interoperability and accessibility. Why is W3C so fond of that?
They drank the Microsoft kook-aid? _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent Richard M. Smith (Dec 03)
- Message not available
- Fwd: How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent Dude VanWinkle (Dec 03)
- Message not available
- Re: How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent Florian Weimer (Dec 07)
- Re: How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 07)
- RE: How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent Richard M. Smith (Dec 07)
- Re: How Microsoft will be changing IE to avoid the Eolas patent Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 07)