funsec mailing list archives
Re: Guy With Really Bad Credit Laughs Off Identity Theft Attempt
From: Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:25:53 -0700
ppl sed:
27 year old Apathy, Illinois resident Jake Brown recently laughed off "repeated futile attempts at online identity theft" citing a dismal, useless credit rating as cause.
Damn, that was my plan as well! Err, that and the fact I have never had a credit card nor paypal account has helped me dismiss worries of identity theft. Still though, current industry reports to the contrary notwithstanding, I still feel unnerved by the fact that I can be identified by either: my word, photo ID, fingerprint, DNA pattern, or (as my ex's will attest to) a particularly funky odor :-(. Each of these gets successively harder to replicate, with the difficulties lessening with advancing technology, science, and the understanding and discovery of anti-pheromones. Harder to replicate is the general miasma of illness that seems to emanate from my person, but this does little to allay my concerns; for technology always advances hand in hand with our understanding of science (with maybe a 10-20 year gap at best, judging from say.. the lifetime of encryption algorithms due to the advancement of clustering, math, and processors) . As soon as one person can use a method of science to determine my identity, another is using scientific methodology to duplicate a method of disproving the former in court ;-). Begin Yammer _______________________________________ The first time I heard of Identity Theft was in 1995. A friend got mugged (for 20 dollars) in New Orleans at Mardi Gras and the incident was soon forgotten (thanks to a favorable ratio of beer over time). The cost was raised to a total of 45 dollars, due to the cost of replacing the wallet as well as his SS card and drivers license (cost: ten, five, and ten dollars to replace (respectively), after informing the County, state, and retailer (respectively) by Word, Registered Letter, and In Person (also, also, respectively). The long term costs, which started three years after the initial compromise and continued till seven years past, until the resolution (due to the notification of and proof presented by an "uneducated consumer" were, well seven years of lawyers fees and loss of jobs/revenue due to: the embarrassment and stigma from a combined appearance of: serving 2 years in prison in one state (while working, paying taxes, and accruing fines in another at the same time) and the central authority (fed.gov) denying this could even happen in the first place. End Yammer My intuition says that we need to have a review process of the methodology of identification and the timeframe in which technology will nullify this form of "evidence", but maybe thats just the beer talking. -JP "I know it wont happen, and I told you it was the beer talking, but that doesnt make it a bad idea" - | JP(beer*time) ----------------- (Duh + D'oh!)Hindsight ------------------ Luck(n) _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Guy With Really Bad Credit Laughs Off Identity Theft Attempt Fergie (Dec 12)
- Re: Guy With Really Bad Credit Laughs Off Identity Theft Attempt Dude VanWinkle (Dec 12)